I gave up on it and went to other powder once the new powder was creating much more force and was slower when compared to the outdated things. I do not bear in mind if I even tried standard h4831 or not; I am imagining not.

H4831SC Powder available in stock now. Ballistically, this Excessive Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Physically, it's got a shorter grain sizing, therefore, the designation SC or limited Minimize. The shorter, far more compact kernels enable the powder to move throughout the powder actions a lot more effortlessly, assisting to reduce the continuous cutting of granules.

4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I discovered this combo creates .5MOA groups with velocity about 3020fps out of a 26" barrel. I exploit this very same powder in my 300wm shooting 180gr products, so It can be good to have just one powder for equally.

Which means the knowledgable handloader can, with a few extrapolation, find a commencing load when only one is outlined for a specific cartridge.

Yup or it will never get the job done very well. And For the reason that OP contains a load applying Varget I might consider to seek out an individual to trade with. May well think of a acquire get scenario.

Considering that there isn't going to seem like any "Formal" Load Data on the market for this Load, can a few of you present a starting point with this combination and factors to consider when Doing the job this Load up?

I don't love to work up a load working with a person great deal of powder then have to work up again due to the fact I run out and also have to get started on employing a new ton range.

If you've got some heavier .224" bullets, you could discover a load that works Okay Together with the 4831. The bullets I attempted which were about 70 grains would not stabilize in my rifle, which experienced the common fourteen" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the most important bullet that could stabilize, nevertheless it did that superbly. It's a amusing-wanting bullet that has a rounded nose profile, but it really shoots terrific and kills perfectly. Deer out to about a hundred and fifty h4831 vs h4831sc yards al went down at once with rib-cage hits.

dioni.a.312 claimed: In my working experience the sole authentic variance is that the shortcut meters better by way of reloading equipment. After it's loaded theres no purposeful big difference. I have read that the shortcut could have a very small bit more quickly burn off fee but It appears insignificant. Simply click to broaden...

The 55grs is all of that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they've slowed down the swift to indicate that their rifles are improved. It bug the hell out of me. I know far better. This is exactly why I do not at any time toss h4831sc load data out my more mature manuals. I do order new handbook continuously to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I use this 39grs in summers @ a hundred+ degrees without any complications.

Despite the similarity in nomenclature, h4831sc They are entirely distinctive powders, with IMR 4831 currently being significantly faster compared to Hodgdon variants. Will not take care of them as exactly the same powder, as they most definitely aren't.

I use 52 grs H4831sc using a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It truly is correct, moderate mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it absolutely was me, I might start out at 52 gr and operate up.

Can I presume that H4831 may be substituted for H4831sc ? I understand the physical difference but will it affect the melt away or velocity? I do think not but I'm not one hundred% positive.

The point that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is precisely why you might be looking at better velocities received with that powder, in contrast to That which you've witnessed Together with the IMR stuff.